2000-03-08                     House Journal                      Page 2456
HB 296                                                                       
The following was read the second time:                                        
                                                                               
HOUSE BILL NO. 296                                                            
"An Act relating to partnerships; amending Rule 25(c), Alaska                 
Rules of Civil Procedure; and providing for an effective date."                
                                                                               
with the:                                                 Journal Page         
                                                                               
	L&C RPT CS(L&C)  3DP 2NR                                         2141         
	ZERO FISCAL NOTE (DCED)                                          2142         
	JUD RPT CS(L&C)  3DP 3NR                                         2234         
	ZERO FISCAL NOTE (DCED) 2/9/00                                   2235         
                                                                               
Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that the                
following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill:        
                                                                               

2000-03-08                     House Journal                      Page 2457
HB 296                                                                       
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 296(L&C)                                                
(same title)                                                                  
                                                                               
There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                   
                                                                               
Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB
(L&C) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and                
placed on final passage.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.         
                                                                               
CSHB 296(L&C) was read the third time.                                         
                                                                               
The question being:  "Shall CSHB 296(L&C) pass the House?"  The                
roll was taken with the following result:                                      
                                                                               
CSHB 296(L&C)                                                                  
Third Reading                                                                  
Final Passage                                                                  
                                                                               
YEAS:  36   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  1   ABSENT:  3                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Bunde, Cissna, Coghill, Cowdery,              
Croft, Davies, Davis, Dyson, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Halcro,               
Harris, Hudson, James, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kohring,                    
Kookesh, Kott, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Phillips, Porter,              
Rokeberg, Sanders, Smalley, Therriault, Whitaker, Williams                     
                                                                               
Excused:  Joule                                                                
                                                                               
Absent:  Berkowitz, Masek, Moses                                               
                                                                               
And so, CSHB 296(L&C) passed the House.                                        
                                                                               
Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll           
call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the             
effective date clauses.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.          
                                                                               
Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll           
call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court       
rule change.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                     
                                                                               
CSHB 296(L&C) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.